|
Sub-theme 28:
Ethical Behaviour and Integrity in Organizations
Convenors:
Call for papers
This sub-theme explores aspects of ethical behaviour and the
related concepts of integrity and trust. Ethical behaviour
refers to an actor’s behaviour, while integrity is
generally considered to be a quality or characteristics of an
actor. Perspectives on integrity include the wholeness
perspective, stressing the need for consistency in the actor's
behaviour, and the moral perspective, stressing the role of
moral values and norms. Trust is commonly conceptualized as the
willingness of one party to be vulnerable to another party.
Theorists often describe the three concepts in conjunction
with one another while focussing on only one. For example,
integrity is sometimes described as either a component or a
precursor of trust. There are a number of questions that might
be addressed by considering these concepts more closely. The
following are examples for questions that could be addressed:
- What are the inter-relationships of ethical behaviour,
integrity, and trust?
- What are the similarities and differences between
ethical behaviour and integrity?
- Does ethical behaviour always imply an actor with (high)
integrity?
- Can an actor who has high integrity behave unethically?
- Can trust exist without the ethical or moral dimension?
Is trust without ethics a desirable concept?
- What is the relationship between ethical behaviour and
trust (or unethical behaviour and distrust)? Is integrity
really as centrally important to trust as e.g. Mayer, Davis
and Schoorman (1995) suggest? Under which conditions, for
which relationships?
- If integrity in leaders refers to consistency of
behaviour, how important is the moral dimension to that
consistency? If integrity in leaders refers to the moral
dimension, how important is the consistency of behaviour to
the moral dimension?
- How does culture influence what makes individual or
organizational integrity or ethical behaviour?
The wave of recent scandals has led to an explosion of new
regulations, monitoring and sanctioning institutions (e.g.
Sarbanes Oxley in the US). However, such regulations, may have
paradoxical effects. The sub theme will also include papers that
consider the effects of these new regulations.
- Under what conditions do regulations and sanctions
enforce ethical behaviour?
- Which regulations and sanctioning systems influence
moral motivation negatively?
- How can a vicious cycle between formal control, distrust
and unethical behaviour be avoided?
- What formal regulations and incentives systems are
likely to engender trust, integrity and ethical behaviour?
Over time expectations about what constitutes ethical
behaviour, an actor’s integrity or an actor’s trustworthiness
have changed:
- How do (moral) values and norms change over time and how
do these changes impact what behaviour is deemed ethical (or
unethical), when actors are deemed to have high integrity (or
not) and when actor's are seen as trustworthy (or not)?
- What made individuals or organizations trustworthy or
have high integrity in different times?
- What was considered ethical and unethical behaviour in
organizations at different times?
The issues of ethical behaviour, integrity, and trust have
been investigated differently in public administration and
management. One of the goals of this sub-theme is to bring
together the perspectives of these two fields, welcoming
scholars from both.
Given the range of questions raised, we expect that a varied
set of methodologies and theoretical orientations will be
appropriate.
About the convenors
Frédérique Six is lecturer
Governance and Management at the Vrije University Amsterdam, The
Netherlands. Her research interests are the management of
integrity and trust in the public and private sector. She holds
a PhD in Management from the Erasmus University Rotterdam and is
now part of the VU Amsterdam research group Integrity of
Governance.
Steven Grover
is a professor of management and deputy dean at the
University of Otago in Dunedin, New Zealand. He studies leader
integrity and is a member of the EGOS board.
Antoinette
Weibel is Oberassistentin (equivalent to assistant professor)
at the University of Zurich, Institute for Organization and
Administrative Science. She holds a PhD in Management Studies
from the University of Zurich, Switzerland. Her research focus
is on trust and specifically on vicious and virtuous cycles of
formal regulations, trust and moral motivation. Antoinette is an
executive member of FINT (first international network on trust). |