EGOS Frontpage  European Group for Organizational Studies
About EGOS | Join | Organization Studies | Conferences | Working Groups | PhD & Postdoc. Information | Job Market | Members
Standing Working Groups  


Principles Governing SWGs

Formation Process
of SWGs


Review Procedure
of SWGs


Standing Working Group on Action Research

« Back

CO-chairs:
Marc Bonnet, ISEOR, University of Jean Moulin Lyon 3
bonnet@iseor.com

Robert MacIntosh, University of Strathclyde
robert@gsb.strath.ac.uk

 Background
This standing group has its roots in the growing demand for more practice-oriented forms of research. A vibrant community of action researchers already exists and, by definition, these researchers work in contexts where changes to practice sit side-by-side with the development of theory. This working group has emerged to offer a forum where those with an interest in action research can exchange views on methods, practices, validity and a range of wider social issues. Standing group status has initially been granted for a three year period starting with the Berlin meeting in 2005. The standing group is however, a continuation of the successful sub-theme meetings which have taken place in Lyon (2001), Copehagen (2003) and Ljubljana (2004).

Remit of the Proposed Standing Group
In recent years the very nature of organisation research has been called into question. Both the British and American Academies of Management have highlighted the need for academic research to develop a closer relationship with practice (see Tranfield and Starkey, 1998; Huff, 2000 and Van de Ven, 2001). This has increased the attention being paid to all forms of practice-oriented research.

Perhaps the most commonly used form of practice-oriented research is action research. In the research methodology marketplace, action research represents an established brand. Whilst the content of the original research conducted by Lewin (1946) has largely been forgotten, the research process employed and the term action research which he coined have become an important touchstone for many others who have followed, or adapted, his approach. Returning to the original source material we find Lewin encouraging us to concern ourselves with "two rather different questions … the study of general laws … and the diagnosis of a specific situation" (1946, p36). It is the possibility of research offering insights to the specific situation which explains current interest in action research. Lewin’s argument might reasonably be interpreted as meaning that research can both help the academic (with their concern for generalisable knowledge) and help the practitioner (and their concern with the specifics of here and now). Action research, in its many forms, is in many ways ideally suited to producing managerially relevant research outputs.

However, in the intervening forty-five years the term has been used so regularly and with such a variety of different meanings, that the phrase itself has "lost some of its original weight." Eden and Huxham characterise action research as research resulting from involvement with an organisation over a matter of genuine concern, where there is the intention to take action on the basis of the intervention (1996). This definition seems to transcend most of the subtle differences between the many methodological variants of action research and some other forms of practice-oriented research.

The aim of this standing group is to explore the full range of methodological, epistemological and ontological issues relating to the practice of action research.

Themes for the First Three Years
In organizing a standing group as opposed to individual sub-themes, our intention is to cover a comprehensive range of issues relating to the conduct of action research. Standing group status will allow a community of interest to develop around the action research theme. We will build a web presence to facilitate the development of this community between EGOS meetings and we believe that by the third meeting (2007), the EGOS action research community will be self-sustaining.

2005

The Practice of Action Research as a Means of Unlocking Organizations
The full call for papers has already been developed and is available on the EGOS web-site. The intention is to share experiences of the action research process and, in so doing, to contribute to the development of action research. The specific focus of the meeting will be the ways in which an action research approach can unlock organizations, opening them to the possibility of change, development, improvement and evolution.

2006

Validity and Epistemology in Action Research
Criticism of AR practices often focus on the problem of bias a research process which, by definition, involves actors who hold opinions and objectives for the research which may be either explicit or implicit.   A key challenge for those conducting AR is to ackowledge and engage with the issue of validity in meaningful ways.  Action researchers face a number of potential pitfalls and this session will focus on the question of "validity" in AR.  Issues such as the extent to which one can generalize from observations made in one specific context, and the relationship (if any) between the epistemological position of action research and other more positivistic approaches ? The 2006 meeting will invite contributions from the AR community in order to develop clear views on benefits and limitations of AR compared to other forms of research.

2007 Social Responsibility and Action Research Practices
Our rapidly changing world requires forms of research which can overcome the difficulties that our organizations and the actors within them face. The final meeting of the AR standing group will focus on the role of action research as a means of empowering organizational actors to adapt to new environments, to become more creative and to become more socially responsible. Specifically, we will  focus on AR in relation to issues of governance and the relationship between academia and practice. 

Support for the Standing Group
The co-chairs Marc Bonnet and Robert MacIntosh have been involved in the running of a number of previous EGOS sub-themes on Action Research. The majority of participants at these previous sub-themes have expressed a desire to be part of building a community of action researchers. E-mail contact has been maintained with these participants and the ISEOR group has offered to develop and support a web-site dedicated to the EGOS Standing Group participants. We are confident that the evidence from previous colloquia shows continued interest in the action research stream with a healthy number of contributors drawn from across Europe, the US and beyond.

Contact Webmaster