Call for Papers
Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT), rooted in the legacy of Vygotsky, Leont'ev and Luria, is a multidisciplinary theory, which has gained increasing popularity and relevance among researchers in the field of organization studies (Adler, 2005; Blackler, 2009). CHAT is inherently a social innovation-oriented theory and thus a relevant approach for reimagining, rethinking, and reshaping organizing and organizations in unsettled times. CHAT provides analytical, conceptual tools, such as models of activity systems, concepts of contradiction and zones of proximal development to examine organizations as designed by human beings (Engeström, 2006; Engeström & Sannino, 2011).
CHAT has proven to be a useful theory, for example in the following areas of organization studies:
- Strategic management
- Organizational learning and competencies
- Organizational change management
CHAT includes an interventionist methodology for development of organizations. The methodology has various applications, such as the Change Laboratory method and the Clinic of Activity. The use of CHAT in the study of organizations has, however, not yet deeply anchored in discussions within organization studies. The aim of this sub-theme is to bring together scholars using activity-theoretical frameworks and to develop and cultivate the use of CHAT in organization studies further. In this sub-theme we identify a range of themes concerning activity theory and organizations. We welcome papers examining themes such as:
- Agency for supporting social innovation processes in organizations
- Dialectical contradictions and their resolutions in organizations in unsettled times
- Rethinking and reshaping concept formation in organizations
- Organizational boundary crossing and knotworking
- Multiple tool constellations and their role in social innovation processes in organizations
We also invite contributions that deal with other, related themes and appreciate papers establishing a dialogue between CHAT and other practice-based theories (Miettinen et al., 2009). We are also interested in theoretical papers taking a critical stance towards CHAT as a theory. We welcome innovative, theoretical and empirical work as well as both micro- and macro-level analysis. We especially appreciate empirical papers using CHAT as a methodological tool in the study of organizations.
Adler, Paul S. (2005): 'The Evolving Object of Software Development.' Organization, 12 (3), pp. 401–436.
Blackler, Frank (2009): 'Cultural-Historical Activity Theory and Organization Studies.' In: Annalisa Sannino, Harry Daniels & Kris D. Gutiérrez (eds.): Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–39.
Engeström, Yrjö (2006): 'Activity theory and expansive design.' In: Sebastiano Bagnara, Gillian Crampton-Smith & Gavriel Salvendy (eds.): Theories and Practice of Interaction Design. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 3–23.
Engeström, Yrjö & Annalisa Sannino (2011): 'Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: a methodological framework.' Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24 (3), pp. 368–387.
Miettinen, Reijo, Dalvir Samra-Fredericks & Dvora Yanow (2009): 'Re-Turn to Practice: An Introductory Essay.' Organization Studies, 30 (12), pp. 1309–1327.